Senior Living Communities in India: What to Verify Before You Sign

Before signing any senior living agreement in India, confirm three things in writing: whether you are buying a RERA-registered unit or entering a service/license arrangement, whether your deposit is refundable and under what conditions, and what happens to care continuity if the operator changes hands. These three points cause most of the disputes families encounter after move-in, and they are rarely explained clearly during a sales visit. This checklist applies whether the community under consideration is in Delhi-NCR, Goa, or elsewhere in India, and is designed to be used alongside — not instead of — a lawyer’s review of the actual agreement.
Why Senior Living Needs a Different Due-Diligence Process Than a Regular Flat
A senior living purchase or enrolment differs from a conventional residential purchase in three structural ways: the resident is typically settling there for the remainder of their life, so continuity of care matters more than it would for a working-age buyer who can simply relocate; many arrangements combine a real estate component with a separate services agreement, each carrying different legal protections; and regulation is still developing and uneven across states, so protections available in Haryana may not exist in the same form in Goa or elsewhere.
Ownership Model vs Lease or License Model: Know What You Are Actually Signing
This is the single most consequential distinction in a senior living agreement, and marketing material often glosses over it.
- Outright purchase (strata-titled unit): The resident owns the apartment, typically within a registered real estate project. In a Rajya Sabha reply on 22 July 2026, the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment confirmed that the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 applies to retirement homes in the same way it applies to other real estate projects when they are sold this way — meaning RERA registration, project disclosures and the standard buyer protections should apply.
- Lease, license or “continuing care” model: The resident pays an entry fee (sometimes called a refundable deposit) plus a recurring service fee, without acquiring title to the unit. This is common among dedicated senior-living and assisted-living operators — see PropIntel’s Independent vs Assisted Living comparison — and is not automatically covered by RERA in the same way as a strata sale, because no real estate unit is being conveyed. Protections here depend entirely on the specific agreement’s terms and whatever state-level guidelines apply.
A related, and increasingly common, question is whether to buy or rent a senior living unit at all — renting preserves flexibility and avoids a large upfront deposit, while buying can make sense for a family planning a long, stable stay in one location. Neither is inherently better; the right structure depends on the resident’s health trajectory, the family’s liquidity, and how confident the family is in that specific operator’s long-term stability.

Private Villas (2 Available) — Goa — Private Resale
Speak directly with Kshitiz Verma, Principal Partner, about this mandate.
Two privately-held villas, available off-market. Details shared directly on enquiry.
What Government Guidelines Already Require — and Where They Apply
Senior living regulation in India is a state subject (land and colonisation fall under Entry 18 of List II of the Seventh Schedule), so the Centre’s role has been to issue model guidance for states to adapt, rather than a single uniform national law.
The Centre’s Model Guidelines
Per the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment’s July 2026 Rajya Sabha reply, the Centre has issued “Model Guidelines for Development and Regulation of Retirement Homes” for states and union territories to adapt into their own rules. These model guidelines call for elderly-friendly design — wheelchair-accessible lifts and ramps, wide corridors with handrails, round-the-clock water and power backup, on-site ambulance access, and in-apartment panic alarms.
Haryana’s Retirement Housing Policy
Haryana has gone further than most states with a dedicated retirement housing policy (reported November 2024) that is specifically relevant to NCR-based families. It requires a maximum of 40% ground coverage on any retirement housing site (with the rest reserved for medical and recreational use), a 24×7 on-site ambulance and first-aid facility linked to a nearby super-specialty hospital, senior-friendly fixtures, and — critically — a tripartite agreement between the resident (allottee), the developer and the service provider, signed before the resident takes possession. It also establishes a monitoring committee under the local Deputy Commissioner, including Residents’ Welfare Association representation, to handle disputes. This policy applies to Haryana projects, including the NCR-area projects covered in PropIntel’s Senior Living for NRI Parents in Delhi-NCR guide; it does not automatically extend to a Goa-based facility such as the one reviewed in PropIntel’s IKIGAI Goa Senior Living article, which would fall under Goa’s own planning and consumer-protection framework.
Maharashtra’s Precedent
MahaRERA drafted model guidelines in February 2024 specifically to stop developers from marketing ordinary housing projects as “retirement homes” or “senior homes” without meeting genuine senior-friendly design standards — a useful reminder that the label itself is not regulated everywhere, and a project can call itself a retirement home without being held to any specific standard in states that have not adopted comparable rules.
The PropIntel Due-Diligence Checklist Before You Sign
- Identify the legal structure. Is this a strata-titled sale (RERA-applicable), or a lease/license/service arrangement? Ask the operator to state this in writing, not verbally.
- If it is a sale, verify RERA registration for the specific project on the relevant state RERA portal (Haryana’s HARERA, UP RERA, Goa RERA, or the applicable state authority) — not just the operator’s corporate reputation.
- Read the tripartite agreement in full where one exists (resident, developer, service provider), and have it reviewed by a lawyer before signing, not after.
- Clarify the deposit structure in writing: what portion, if any, is refundable; under what conditions (relocation, hospitalisation, death); how long a refund takes; and whether any deductions apply.
- Ask for the exit and buyback terms specifically, including what happens if the resident’s family wants to exit within the first year.
- Map the healthcare escalation pathway: which hospital is the named emergency tie-up, how far it is, and what on-site medical capability actually exists day to day versus what is described in marketing material.
- Check the fee-escalation clause for the recurring service fee — how often it can rise, by how much, and whether increases are capped or linked to an index.
- Ask what happens if the operator changes hands or exits the business — this is rarely addressed proactively and should be asked directly.
- Verify who owns the underlying land and building, particularly for license-model communities where the resident has no title interest at all.
- Request the operator’s years in operation and occupancy track record at this specific property, not just its marketing materials for other properties.
Independent Living, Assisted Living and Continuing-Care Models Compared
| Model | Typical structure | Healthcare intensity | Best suited for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent living | Purchase or lease of a self-contained unit with shared amenities | Low; residents largely self-sufficient | Active seniors prioritising community and convenience over care |
| Assisted living | Usually a service/license fee covering staff-supported daily living | Moderate; help with daily activities, medication management | Seniors needing regular, non-emergency support |
| Continuing-care / full-service | Entry fee plus recurring fee, often with tiered care levels on one campus | Variable, designed to scale up with need | Families wanting to avoid relocating as care needs increase over time |
NCR and Goa: The Same Checklist, Different Local Context
This checklist applies equally regardless of location, but the regulatory backdrop differs. In Delhi-NCR, Haryana’s retirement housing policy gives families a named state framework and dispute-resolution body for Haryana-based projects. Goa has no equivalent dedicated policy identified in this research, which makes the tripartite agreement and the operator’s own track record proportionally more important there. PropIntel’s comparison of NCR and Goa senior living covers cost and location trade-offs; this article focuses on verifying the agreement itself, wherever the facility is located.
Red Flags That Should Make You Pause
- The sales team cannot clearly state whether you are buying a RERA-registered unit or entering a license arrangement.
- No written tripartite or services agreement is offered before a booking deposit is requested.
- Refund conditions on the entry deposit are described verbally but not specified in the contract.
- The marketed “nearby hospital” tie-up cannot be confirmed directly with that hospital.
- The operator has been running this specific property for under a year and has no other property with a multi-year occupancy track record.
When Waiting, or Choosing a Different Model, May Be the Better Decision
If the legal structure cannot be clearly established in writing, or if the operator cannot produce a tripartite agreement and clear refund terms before requesting a deposit, waiting is the more defensible choice regardless of how appealing the facility tour is. A family uncertain about a parent’s future care needs may also be better served by starting with a lease or trial-stay arrangement, where one is offered, rather than committing to a large non-refundable entry fee at a model the resident has not yet experienced day to day.
Key Takeaways
- Establish in writing whether you are buying a RERA-registered unit or entering a lease/license arrangement — this determines which legal protections actually apply.
- A Rajya Sabha reply (22 July 2026) confirms RERA applies to retirement homes sold as real estate, but many senior-living arrangements are structured as services, not sales.
- Haryana’s retirement housing policy requires a tripartite agreement and a Deputy Commissioner-led monitoring committee for Haryana projects specifically; this does not automatically apply outside the state.
- Deposit refundability, exit terms, and the healthcare escalation pathway should all be confirmed in writing before any payment is made.
- The same checklist applies in both Delhi-NCR and Goa, but Goa currently has less state-specific regulatory backing than Haryana.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does RERA apply to senior living and retirement homes in India?
According to a Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment reply in the Rajya Sabha on 22 July 2026, RERA applies to retirement homes in the same way it applies to other real estate projects when a unit is sold as real estate. However, many senior-living communities operate on a lease or license model rather than a sale, and RERA’s buyer protections are designed around the sale structure — so this must be confirmed for the specific project.
Is my deposit refundable if I leave a senior living community?
This depends entirely on the specific agreement. Ask for the refund conditions, timeline and any deductions in writing before paying any deposit; do not rely on a verbal assurance from the sales team.
What is the difference between buying and renting a senior living apartment?
Buying typically means acquiring title to a unit (where the project is structured as a real estate sale), while renting or taking a license means paying for the right to occupy and use services without ownership. Renting generally offers more flexibility and a lower upfront commitment; buying can suit a family confident in a long-term stay at a specific, well-verified property.
What happens if the senior living operator changes management or exits the business?
This should be addressed explicitly in the agreement. If it is not, ask directly before signing — continuity of care and the status of any deposit paid are the two main exposures if an operator exits or is acquired.
Are the due-diligence steps different for Delhi-NCR versus Goa?
The checklist itself is the same. The difference is regulatory backing: Haryana has a specific retirement-housing policy with a formal dispute-resolution mechanism for projects in the state, while PropIntel’s research did not identify an equivalent dedicated framework in Goa, making the operator’s own agreement and track record more important there.
PropIntel Perspective
Senior living in India is maturing as an asset and service category, but regulation has not caught up uniformly across states, and the gap between a strata-sale unit and a license-model arrangement is not always made clear at the point of sale. This due-diligence process suits a family willing to ask direct, sometimes uncomfortable questions before paying a deposit, and to involve a lawyer in reviewing the actual agreement rather than relying on brochure language. It is less suited to a family under time pressure to move a parent in quickly, where the temptation is to skip verification steps — that is precisely the situation in which the checklist matters most. Nothing here should be read as a recommendation of any specific operator or facility; every agreement should be independently verified and reviewed by qualified legal counsel before signing.
Sources and Methodology
- Rajya Sabha Unstarred Question No. 448, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, reply dated 22 July 2026 (via StaffNews, 23 July 2026). Accessed 16 October 2026.
- The Tribune, “Eye on Ageing Population, Haryana Govt to Regulate Retirement Housing Projects,” 8 November 2024. Accessed 16 October 2026.
- Housing.com, “MahaRERA Drafts Model Guidelines for Senior Citizen Homes,” 8 February 2024 (circular dated 2 February 2024). Accessed 16 October 2026.
- PropIntel analysis; no PropIntel transaction data is implied in these figures.
Information reviewed on: 16 October 2026. Facts that may change: state-level regulatory adoption, specific operator terms, and fee structures. Recommended review: within 90 days.
Explore more in Senior Living and Property Due Diligence, or see PropIntel’s advisory services for agreement-review support.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax or financial advice. Readers should obtain project-specific legal advice and have any senior living agreement reviewed by a qualified lawyer before signing or making any payment.

